Follow GP Racing on

Latest Issue

Subscription offer

Subscribe to the world's best grand prix magazine


  • Subscribe today and get 3 issues for £3
  • Print + Digital bundle includes Autosport Plus,'s premium content
  • Never miss an issue
Subscribe to GP Racing today
Subscribe now

There’s a certain well-worn maxim that “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. While serviceable enough in most contexts, it sits uneasily upon the shoulders of Formula 1 as we contemplate a 2024 season of almost no change – and a To-Be-Confirmed future ruleset arriving in 2026 under which not a lot will change. Late capitalism dictates a trajectory of eternal growth and it appears F1’s stakeholders have bought unquestioningly into an immediate and distant future in which the rapid growth curve (in both audience reach and commercial revenues) seen in recent years is extrapolated onwards to the stratosphere. Strap yourselves in – billion-dollar franchise values here we come!

And yet there is evidence to suggest the froth is blowing off. We’ll skirt past last year’s survey which majored on F1 social media interactions being in sharp decline; the commercial rights holder disputes the numbers and, indeed, the source was one of those PR-guff-dressed-up-as-news emails that sensible folk delete straight away (unless it’s a slow news day). Let’s consider, instead, the hard facts of audience fatigue: flattening TV ratings, 
plus indifferent ticket sales at many venues.

That’s why we’ve taken the opportunity this month to muse over whether doing nothing is the right course of action. While F1 may not be in need of an intervention so substantial as to merit the term ‘fix’, there are tweaks and corrections which would improve the spectacle. Our main aim in composing this shopping list was to avoid ill-considered sticking-plaster solutions which have arrived freighted with unforeseen consequences over the past few years. We are, after all, still living through an era where tyre performance is essentially defined by Bernie Ecclestone’s ‘lightbulb moment’ during the 2010 Canadian GP.

Sadly, it looks as though more rather than fewer of these “patches” – not my word but one chosen by Red Bull technical director Pierre Wache – are in prospect. Come 2026 the MGU-H, that most difficult element of the hybrid powertrain to get right, is to be deleted in the name of ‘simplicity’ (ie forming less of a barrier to entry for new power unit suppliers). In tandem with this, the contribution of the electrified part of the powertrain will rise to 50% of total power output. Simulations are suggesting cars may run out of battery power on some tracks. Active aerodynamics have been proposed as a cure for this, at a cost of making the target car-weight cut of 50kg more difficult to achieve.

Active aero may be an increasingly frequent feature on high-performance road cars but in Formula 1 it appears to be the epitome of a sticking-plaster fix to a self-created problem. Feel free to disagree – we might even help F1 move that poor benighted social-media-interactions needle…

Inside the issue

This month's features include

Drive to re-thrive
If Formula 1 does indeed need fixing, how best can it be done?

Now that was a car
The car that underlined Honda’s turbo cred, the Williams FW10

Sergio Pérez
Why 2023 went awry, and what’s in store for the Mexican in 2024

Emanuele Pirro
McLaren development driver to developing drivers for McLaren

The kingmaker
Possibly the best team not in F1 celebrates 40 years of success

Pictures of the year
The best images of 2023 from our dazzling array of photographers

Emerson Fittipaldi
On early racing in Europe, two world titles, and Nigel Mansell...

F1 uncovered
On the grid with Haas

Subscribe to the world's best grand prix magazine

Print & digital bundle

  • All the benefits of a print subscription
  • Enjoy digital access on any device
  • Access’s premium content, Autosport Plus